Pezeshkian’s visit comes amidst a period of heightened regional tensions, particularly in the fight against ISIS, and underscores the importance of regional cooperation in addressing these challenges. Pezeshkian’s visit is significant because it represents a continuation of the strong bilateral ties between Iran and Iraq, which have been characterized by close economic and political cooperation. This cooperation has been particularly evident in the areas of trade, energy, and security. For instance, Iran has been a major supplier of oil and gas to Iraq, providing vital energy resources for the country’s economic development.
The Iranian official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said that Iran’s relations with neighboring countries, particularly with Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon, have been strengthened in recent years. These countries have become increasingly important as a buffer zone against the pressure of Western sanctions. He further explained that these countries have been instrumental in facilitating trade and economic cooperation between Iran and other countries, particularly in the region.
This arrangement, however, is facing challenges. The U.S. has imposed new sanctions on Iran, which could disrupt the gas supply. The Iranian government has also been facing internal challenges, including economic woes and political instability. These challenges have led to a precarious situation for the gas supply to Iraq. The Iranian gas export to Iraq is a complex and multifaceted issue with significant implications for both countries. It is a vital lifeline for Iraq, providing a significant portion of its electricity needs. However, the arrangement is fraught with challenges, including potential disruptions from U.S. sanctions and internal political and economic instability in Iran.
U.S. policy, however, is to avoid direct military action against Syrian and Iraqi governments. Instead, they focus on supporting rebel groups, providing humanitarian aid, and engaging in diplomacy. This strategy has been criticized for being ineffective and for failing to address the conflict’s underlying causes.
